02
Feb
15

good grief

charliebrown2

If you’re from outside the country and reading this blog, you probably expect a certain level of stupidity from America when it comes to how we sometimes handle our kids. Don’t you just love how smug and superior you feel when you say, “We would never do it like that.”

Well, I’m going to tell you two stories… one which will fulfill every prejudice you harbor about Americans, and one which can be summed up in just one word: “Gotcha!”

.

Story #1: A fourth grader—a 9-year-old—in Kermit TX was suspended for making “terroristic threats” after allegedly telling a classmate that he had a “magic ring” that could make the boy disappear.

According to Kermit Elementary School officials, 9-year-old Aiden Steward told a classmate that he possessed a magic ring forged in Mount Doom—a fictional location from J.R.R. Tolkien’s Hobbit and Lord of the Rings series.

Aiden’s father, Jason, said his family had just watched The Hobbit: The Battle of Five Armies earlier that week, and that his son “didn’t mean anything” when he told his classmate he was in possession of the “one ring to rule them all.” He added: “I assure you my son lacks the magical powers necessary to threaten his friend’s existence.”

But Kermit Elementary Principal Roxanne Greer, a manifestly brilliant and imaginative woman, said that any and all threats to a child’s safety—including magical ones—would be taken seriously by the school.

If you want to revel in your superiority, you can read about this incident in the Odessa American or at The Raw Story.

.

Now, just to demonstrate that stupidity is not confined to the New World, here is Story #2 from France.

An 8-year-old boy from Nice claimed to support the men who attacked the satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo and was detained and questioned by police for “defending terrorism.”

Fabienne Lewandowski, deputy director for public security in the Alpes-Maritimes region, said last week that the boy declared “I am with the terrorists” and refused to take part in the national minute of silence for the victims. The child had allowed that the journalists had ridiculed the Prophet, and the boy does have an Islamic-sounding name.

A lawyer for the child says the decision to question the child at a police station shows a “collective hysteria.” (Dozens of people have been arrested and accused of defending terrorism since the attacks.)

“These laws are inherently vague and open to abuse—the abuse being the prosecution of the expression of sympathy rather than incitement to a crime,” said John Dalhuisen, Europe and Central Asia director for Amnesty International.

If you want to read more about this story, here are links to The Wall Street Journal and UPI.

.

It seems clear that in both cases, neither child could have understood the meaning ascribed to their words by the adults around them. It is the adults who should have their heads examined.

۞

Groove of the Day

Listen to the Foo Fighters performing “Good Grief”

.

Weather Report

44° and Cloudy

Advertisements

1 Response to “good grief”


  1. February 2, 2015 at 1:48 pm

    I will not pronounce an advice on the case of this young Texan too imaginative and his school responsible. I’d settle for here expose the developments in the case of the young French, according to our Medias.
    1) The boy risks nothing, in regard of the laws. Legally, it is his father who is responsible. The boy was verbally reprimanded by the police and the school staff placed him under an enhanced educational measure – this means only that they will pay more attention to him.
    2) Police intervention was requested by the school director because the father was known for having a violent behavior and he feared for safety if he convened him in his office, as it would have been the normal procedure.
    3) The complaint for “condoning terrorism” was filed by judicial authorities, not by school official, against the father.
    It is obvious that the kid only repeated the words he heard elsewhere, by bravado or to make the interesting, as it is often the case at this age. It is also clear that he has absolutely not the maturity required for issuing in a rational way such an opinion and that he didn’t understand all the meanings of these words.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: